Reflecting on 20 Years of Practice-Based Evidence in Nutrition (PEN)
As two of the original architects that developed and launched Practice-based Evidence in Nutrition® (PEN) in 2005, we are honoured to reflect on its evolution and value two decades later.
The PEN System was created in response to findings from environmental scans and key informant interviews. Analyses revealed a pressing need among dietitians for support to navigate the overwhelming volume of nutrition information and to identify high-quality evidence to underpin professional advice.
Since its inception, the PEN System has proven to be a trusted source of evidence-based guidance, continually incorporating the latest research pertinent to practical nutrition-related questions. It is one of the innovative tools that has enabled Dietitians of Canada to elevate the role of dietitians as leading credible nutrition experts.
The information environment has shifted dramatically since the PEN System was initiated. We are now witness to a rise in anti-science and anti-expert sentiment. Pseudoscientific beliefs and conspiratorial thinking are gaining traction. They often challenge or replace scientific consensus, negatively impact public policy and undermine even well-established scientific institutions.
Experts now warn of the growing presence of AI-generated misinformation—so-called “junk science”—flooding social media and online health platforms. This phenomenon represents a strategic manipulation of the public knowledge base. Whereas clients once presented with questionable information sourced from the internet when consulting dietitians, they now offer content from tools like ChatGPT. These materials often lack context or require nuanced interpretation.
In this new landscape, it is more important than ever for dietitians in all practice settings to actively counter misinformation across digital platforms. As the PEN System marks its 20th anniversary, it remains committed to evolving alongside emerging technologies to support dietetic practitioners with rigorously curated, unbiased evidence reviews.